Showing posts sorted by relevance for query theron schmidt. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query theron schmidt. Sort by date Show all posts

National Platform - Day Two - 19 April 2009

National Theatre Studio

19 April 2009



Over two days, the SPILL National Platform presented 20 performance works by emerging artists, selected from almost 300 applications. The works reflected an incredibly diverse range of forms and themes: durational and installation work, engagements with the conventions of theatre, interactive provocations, and autobiographical narrative.


As writers, we knew we would be unable to respond in detail to all of the work, but we also wanted to avoid imposing any selective criteria, even a random one, on which work was covered. We decided in advance of the Platform that we would impose a constraint on our responses. This would provide a structure for giving equal space to each of the performances and would make the most of our limited time. We decided that we would respond to each of the works, and we would limit our response to the space of a 3x5 index card.


We like the idea that each of the identical cards seems analogous to the opportunity offered to the emerging artists: a blank slot, to be filled individually, but unavoidably to be experienced side-by-side with the rest of the programme, as part of an assembly or collection of material.


Although for the most part we have prepared our cards after the event, there’s also something about this format that reflects the experience of writing: taking notes in the dark, collecting fragments and impressions and responses. Trying to capture not just the event on stage but our internal journeys. Thinking always, at every moment, even before the moment has finished, about how to translate into words the transient and complex experience.


These cards are only scraps, only partial and inadequate records of the events of the weekend, but we hope something of the extraordinary and boundless diversity of work is reflected by these responses. Perhaps they can stand as the beginning of a discussion – please add your own comments below.


Theron Schmidt


Please click on each image to view larger.

Note: You made need to zoom out/in using your browser to view the image in a suitable size.


Victoria Pratt - Chasing Next Door's Cat

by Mary Paterson




Sohail Khan - Stress Positioning
by Rachel Lois Clapham



Simon Bowes - Kings of England
by Alex Eisenberg

Alex continues his response to this work here.



Silvia Rimat - Being Here While Not Being Here
by Theron Schmidt



Rasp Thorne - Blinded Descention
by Rachel Lois Clapham



Nicola Conibere - Count One
by Mary Paterson



Simone Kenyon and Neil Callaghan
To Begin Where I Am...Mokado
by Alex Eisenberg

Alex continues his response to this work here.


Sara Popowa - Stick Piece
by Eleanor Hadley Kershaw



Natasha Davis - Rupture
by Mary Paterson



Taylan Hallici - Introduction to floodlondon
by Mary Kate Connolly




To read cards from day one click here.


The writers participating were Mary Kate Connolly, Rachel Lois Clapham, Alex Eisenberg, Eleanor Hadley Kershaw, Mary Paterson and Theron Schmidt.

National Platform - Day One - 18th April 2009

National Theatre Studio

18 April 2009


Over two days, the SPILL National Platform presented 20 performance works by emerging artists, selected from almost 300 applications. The works reflected an incredibly diverse range of forms and themes: durational and installation work, engagements with the conventions of theatre, interactive provocations, and autobiographical narrative.


As writers, we knew we would be unable to respond in detail to all of the work, but we also wanted to avoid imposing any selective criteria, even a random one, on which work was covered. We decided in advance of the Platform that we would impose a constraint on our responses. This would provide a structure for giving equal space to each of the performances and would make the most of our limited time. We decided that we would respond to each of the works, and we would limit our response to the space of a 3x5 index card.


We like the idea that each of the identical cards seems analogous to the opportunity offered to the emerging artists: a blank slot, to be filled individually, but unavoidably to be experienced side-by-side with the rest of the programme, as part of an assembly or collection of material.


Although for the most part we have prepared our cards after the event, there’s also something about this format that reflects the experience of writing: taking notes in the dark, collecting fragments and impressions and responses. Trying to capture not just the event on stage but our internal journeys. Thinking always, at every moment, even before the moment has finished, about how to translate into words the transient and complex experience.


These cards are only scraps, only partial and inadequate records of the events of the weekend, but we hope something of the extraordinary and boundless diversity of work is reflected by these responses. Perhaps they can stand as the beginning of a discussion – please add your own comments below.


Theron Schmidt



Please click on each image to view larger.

Please Note: You made need to zoom out/in using your browser to view the image in a suitable size.


Mamoru Iriguchi - Pregnant?!

by Alex Eisenberg




Madeleine Trigg - Sutre

by Mary Paterson



Elyssa Livergant - A Kiss From the Last Red Squirrel
by Mary Kate Connolly


Neil Trefor Hughes
Minimalist Music for Young People
by Alex Eisenberg
Alex continues his response to this work here.


Claire Adams -Photopollution
By Rachel Lois Clapham



Catalina Garces - Identi-ffy
By Rachel Lois Clapham


Mitch and Parry

I Host You, Now Tonight, Let Me Show You How

by Alex Eisenberg




Alex continues his response to Mitch and Parry here.

Amanda Couch - Dust Passing
by Mary Paterson



Other, Other, Other
Long Winded in Five Parts
by Eleanor Hadley Kershaw


Nathan Walker - Bad Bad
by Mary Kate Connolly

To read cards from day two click here.

The writers participating were Mary Kate Connolly, Rachel Lois Clapham, Alex Eisenberg, Eleanor Hadley Kershaw, Mary Paterson and Theron Schmidt.

Symbolic Gestures by Theron Schmidt

Ringside

by Mem Morrison


In the faded grandeur of Shoreditch Town Hall, now available as a wedding venue, Mem Morrison’s Ringside traces through fragments of past weddings in a kind of ghost-dance with heritage and tradition. Eighty audience members sit around a large U-shaped table, each listening to music and monologues through individual headsets, while Morrison and 18 volunteers, all women, perform as host and hostesses in the middle of the space.


Welcomed like a guest as much as like an audience member, I experience myself drifting through a strange blend of the real and the symbolic in which each becomes caught up in the other. There’s a spectacular parade of plates, glasses, and place-settings – but they’re just simple drawings printed on cardboard boxes. The women make sham dresses and veils out of thin plastic bags – but then they coax some of us onto the floor for a dance that is awkward as only reality can be. Archival wedding films, genuine but of another time, are juxtaposed with a live feed of the present assembly, who are not real guests but who are really here. New stories are superimposed over old photographs, and the mediation of the entire event through headphones makes the whole thing slightly out of sync with itself.


This blend suits Morrison’s subject: the nature of the wedding celebration is itself such a confusion of the real and the symbolic. The dominance of the colour white, the order of events, the carefully chosen costumes, the public display of it all, and of course the weighty consequences of a few spoken words … these symbolic elements all gesture toward a reality which is so significant that it needs elaborate codes to contain it. But these codifications also naturalise social roles and expectations, producing them as natural and unavailable for interrogation. Ringside examines some of the more obvious and suspect of these codes – the bizarre persistence of rituals based on the rupture of the virgin bride’s hymen – but also some of the less obvious ones, such as the distinctions between childhood and adulthood and the compulsive demand for generational continuity.


Another social form which blends the real and the symbolic is the cliché: those supposedly fictional generalisations which in reality end up becoming self-fulfilling. When performance engages with cliché there is often the danger of reproducing it such that the performance itself becomes clichéd, and Ringside walks this line. I felt uncomfortable with the way the form of the piece often rested uncritically upon tropes of performance participation, or the evocation, with which the piece ends, of the too familiar image of the marriage-phobic male. But there are moments, achieved through the delicate care of Morrison’s writing, or in the way his movement and dancing put his own body on the line, in which form and content become much more fluid, and the real and the symbolic become intermingled, undistinguishable, and unconstrained by tradition. This spillage, perhaps, is what performance can do.


Theron is a writer and performer. http://www.newworknetwork.org.uk/theron

On being with her by Theron Schmidt

Vanessa: Look mummy, I’m dancing

Soho Theatre

15 April 2009

She’s not like other women. She watches a man hassle and belittle his female partner in the supermarket checkout, and, so she tells us, she wonders whether she made the right choice. She’s not like other women, born anatomically male, but, so she tells us, convinced from her first breath that something was not right. She’s not like the others, who never had to be ostracised, pathologised, diagnosed condescendingly with gender identity disorder. She’s not like the rest, for whom easy remedies are available and unremarkable for their body issues: a little nose job here, a little liposuction there. She’s not like the others, because she was one of the first.


This is Vanessa’s story, of how she always identified herself as a woman and eventually became the first transsexual in Belgium. But what’s surprising in Vanessa’s story is how familiar it all seems. Her story rests on a series of scenes that feel commonplace, almost shorthand, like little photo-postcard moments. The boy who is not like the other boys. The mother who worries about whether she wished too hard for a girl. The father who wants his boy to play football. The goodbye to the first lover at a train station, crowded with homeward bound soldiers. The angelic Moroccan nurse who comforts her after the surgery.


Even at its most moving, there’s something almost self-consciously emblematic about her story. The scene where she tells her mother that no, she’s not acting anymore – she’s dancing, and the awful pathos of her mother’s realisation that ‘dancing’ is a euphemism. The scene of reconciliation, when her supposedly uncompassionate father asks her to come close, for he ‘has another daughter now.’ These are moving, heartfelt moments, moments you would want in a good screenplay, or a season finale. They are truthful moments of vulnerability and compassion – but, in a story about a life that is so unconventional, it is striking how much they are conventionally so.


The whole piece has this easy, light-hearted attitude toward theatre. In contrast with the rest of the festival, this is not an occasion for provocation or experimentation. It’s a tidy story that would disturb no one, that is told conversationally but that is also obviously a carefully prepared script, one that is filled with pathos and bathos and ends happily with marriage.


Without wanting to assume too much from her story, perhaps her complicated life has left her particularly attracted to these uncomplicated moments. What others might take for granted – the obvious and familiar of the everyday – may not have been common, easy, or obvious to her. Perhaps this story is an expression of a desire for this clarity, for an unproblematic match between how things seem and how they are. Or maybe she has been aware of the singularity of her life all along, has lived it as a biopic in the making, selecting scenes as she lives through them. I don’t know. I don’t know what it’s been like to be her, despite having heard her life story. How could I?


But the story she tells is only part of the experience. It’s one reason I’m here, in order to hear her story, but I’ve also come in order to see her. She’s come to tell her story, but she’s also come to show. To appear before us. To appear before us in this body that she has made for herself, and to speak in the voice that she has claimed as her own against significant obstacles. And it’s a remarkable body, with something liquid and changeable about it. Tears always just behind her eyes, and a softness in the back of her throat. She leans and sways across the stage, holding each of us in her eyes, and being held herself in ours. Look mummy, I’m dancing.


When Vanessa impersonates her mother, it is clear that something of her mother lives inside her, and when she impersonates her father, it is also clear that her body has both woman and man and inside it. Being in my body, being together with other bodies, as we watch her, I have a sense of the collective body. Not just as an aggregate of us to which we each contribute our individuality, but in the sense of a collection, a gathering of parts and pieces and histories that each of us claim but that none of us really own. How my body is both mine, but also the vessel through which my culture acts upon me. How the way that each of us holds our body is partly determined by the collective hold over us, and the way that the common’s hold over us is through our bodies, through our bodies on display, through the way we must appear to each other. The theatre: the seeing place, the space of appearance.


And then the part of the experience that consists of her telling a story comes to an end, and what’s left is just us being in the room together. The proximity of our bodies, the crossing of our gazes, our being in common. We are clapping for each other now. And this is a moment of pure acknowledgement, a moment of affirmation which goes both ways, and I find myself to have become liquid too, spilling over with emotion. Engaged in this nonsense gesture, clapping clumsy hands against each other, as a pretence to prolong the moment, to permit this last look at each other before we return, again, to the conventions and dramas of everyday life.

Theron is a writer and performer. http://www.newworknetwork.org.uk/theron

You tell us that we are children by Theron Schmidt


That Night Follows Day

by Victoria and Tim Etchells

Queen Elizabeth Hall, Southbank Centre


They are 16 performers whose ages range between 8 and 14. They mostly speak in unison, but occasionally in small subgroups, or individually into a microphone. They speak in Dutch, and their words in English are projected onto a blackboard over their heads as they speak. For the most part, the words they say are formed into sentences that have the structure ‘You [something] us’, as in ‘You dress us’ or ‘You feed us’ or ‘You tell us when to sit and when to stand’.


This is the scenario. It’s one in which the possibilities for the precarious, funny, obvious, and unexpected are all bubbling at the surface from the beginning. And the words that are to be spoken have been prepared long before we encounter them. They have been prepared by an adult, Tim Etchells, an expert on theatre, a writer. And systematically, exhaustively, this range of possibility, present from the beginning, is played out. Nothing happens to change the structure of the event: the simple fact of young performers speaking these kinds of sentences written by someone who knows his craft. Nothing happens which is not an exploration of what is apparent from the outset. But as the structure explores itself, I find that my own thoughts about what I am watching change significantly, that the categories that I think I would use to describe it start to break down and become inoperable.


It begins with a tone of accusation. The children speak in unison, reflecting the totality of the extent to which young people’s lives are out of their control. But it’s a totality which overreaches itself. As the list of information that is required of them goes on, it becomes absurdly impossible: the knowledge of right and wrong, the delicacies of every social situation, the history of the world and all of scientific discovery. How do they ever learn all this? How do any of us ever learn all this? Just when I think that this is an incredibly adult thing of which to be aware, the text adopts this adult perspective, with the speakers describing the things that ‘we’ think about ‘them’, our backwards-looking thoughts that have nothing to do with the reality of childhood.


So the text keeps shifting, always one step ahead of me, anticipating any question I think of about what I am watching. I reflect on the challenge of the performance task, the memorisation required – and the text becomes exaggeratedly virtuosic, spilling off into elaborately long constructions and bravado displays of wordplay. I think about the taboos about what children should and shouldn’t think – and the text becomes peppered with obscenities, with bigotries, the petty prejudices and hypocritical judgements of the ‘adult’ world. I think about the theatricality of the situation – and the performers say, ‘You give us words to memorise. You make us stand in lines. You tell us that an actor is only a parrot saying words he cannot understand.’


The obvious thing to say about this piece is that it is a piece about children and the power of adulthood – indeed, the newspaper extract quoted in the festival publicity calls this ‘perhaps the finest show about parenthood and childhood ever produced in Europe’. However, something more subtle and contradictory than this is happening. The piece has childhood as its central theme, but I cannot shake the feeling that somehow the performers have stopped being children – stopped being only children, anyway. Because of being on stage, these children are not really here; or they are not-here at the same time as they are here. Any of them could just as easily be a different child from another school – in fact, they were a different group two years ago when the work was first performed by a group of now-too-old children. And what they are constantly presenting and re-presenting is the idea of what is happening, the idea of a child speaking, represented by a child speaking. The child is both there and is also only the idea of a child being there.


Watching them I think: this is not just about the politics of childhood but about the politics of theatre. I think: something equalising happens to everything that appears on a stage. It’s a peculiar kind of equality, which works by doubling everything so that it is no stronger or weaker than its opposite. No difference, other than the perception of difference, between being and doing. Between reality and illusion. Between human and non-human. Between living and non-living. Between present and absent. Between dancing and walking. Between showing and telling. Between playing and screaming. Between violence and jest. Between mask and face. Between idea and image.


Watching them I think: inside this event, there is no longer any such thing as childhood. There is only the distinction called childhood, the distinction between child and adult. And this distinction – how it is formed and when and why – is a political one, one in which there is much at stake. It is also this distinction which is thoroughly obliterated by this particular theatrical event, precisely through its continuous, unrelenting articulation of ‘you’ and ‘us’. Through the line they keep forming and re-forming at the front of the stage, the line behind which everything is overshadowed by the idea of itself. Through the exhaustion of the structure. Through the way the structure exhausts itself. Watching them I think: what defines childhood, the only thing that defines childhood, is that some group tells some other group that they are children.


It is only in the curtain call, when the performers stand before me looking goofy, pleased and excited for what they’ve done, that they start being children again, and I again feel the responsibility of being an adult. I applaud, encouragingly, in my way of saying ‘well done children’, and at the same time I feel all the condescension of the gesture. But I feel compelled to keep clapping supportively, enthusiastically, in a performance of earnest affection and care – because it’s what adults do.


Theron is a writer and performer. http://www.newworknetwork.org.uk/theron

Overspill: Shuffling the Deck


In the words of Robert Pacitti, in the introduction to the limited edition SPILL Tarot pack, ‘the tarot stands as viable a means of interpreting the world as any other – including science, philosophy and mathematics – and I defy any sceptic to prove otherwise.’ A Tarot pack is a set of 78 cards most often used, in English speaking countries at least, for the purposes of divination (in France and Italy it’s also used for playing games). The pack is made up of the Major and Minor Arcana, people and things that represent the elements of our world and the characters within it, and Tarot readings are carried out in relation to spiritual enlightenment, psychic communication, and the occult. But, as Robert Pacitti points out, a reading is as much an act of interpretation as one of prediction – the meaning of the cards reflects the reader’s frame of reference as well as her frame of mind. It’s this ability to crystallise thought that gives the cards their power.


In the case of the SPILL pack, the cards’ power is enhanced by the symbolic resonance of the images, and the way they have been produced. The Major Arcana – character types that include The Fool, The Hermit, The Moon, and everything in-between – are pictures of artists and other contemporary ‘mavericks’ from across the fields of art, academia, cultural activism and beyond. I have just cut the pack in three to reveal Robert Pacitti – Artistic Director of the Pacitti Company and creator, producer and curator of the SPILL Festival (‘Death’); Lois Kiedan – co-founder and director of the Live Art Development Agency (‘Justice’); and Empress Stah – trapeze artist, Neo Cabaret performer and producer (‘The Star’). The pictures were taken by the photographer Manuel Vason, who has devised a unique working method in which he collaborates with his subjects to capture performances made for the camera. As a result, the SPILL Tarot pack does not just help crystallise the thoughts of the person using it; it also goes some way to crystallise the processes of collaboration, challenge and knowledge-sharing inherent in the SPILL Festival itself.


Coming at the start of the pack, The Fool is the journeyman of the Tarot, an innocent and a visionary who may be drawn in any direction by the rest of the cards. As such, the Fool embodies the reader and all her potential. The SPILL Tarot Fool is a figure in mid-air, leaping with abandon against the greying landscape of modern agriculture. A stony, pit-holed path winds through fields of dried out crops; an energy pylon and other industrial buildings line the horizon. As s/he jumps, the androgynous figure of the Fool stretches out of her newspaper costume, and pulls her mouth tight between a grin and a grimace. Above, a small clear moon makes an early appearance before sunset. Behind, a dog looks warily at the strange traveller with her eyes covered and her feet bare.


It’s hard to tell if the Fool is jumping for joy or desperation. She exists in both day and night, in the freedom of outdoors and within the cultivation of industrial agriculture. Suspended in the air, suspended in time and suspended between places, this figure embodies the ‘unbridled primal energy’ of the Fool.


But the card is also a picture of Rajni Shah, whose performance piece Dinner with America, was programmed into the SPILL Festival; and it’s easy to see how, like her performance, this image draws on the potency of symbols that slip in and out of recognition. But the energy of this suspended image – with Shah’s head thrown back and her arms stretching away from her body– must also be down to the eye of the photographer, Manuel Vason, and the synergy of the collaboration. There was also another collaborator in this image – Lucille Acevedo-Jones, a costume designer who works regularly with Shah, and who designed the newspaper dress for this Fool.



Like all the cards of the Major Arcana in this Tarot pack, the Fool is dripping with the residue of multiple and combined professional practices – the traces of as many professional practices, perhaps, as there are knowledge systems touched by Tarot itself. By bringing together this collection of people inside the rich symbolic web of Tarot , the project of the SPILL Tarot pack represents the working methodology behind the festival. As a whole, SPILL 09 was a collaboration between artists, producers, venues and audiences across a wide terrain – large theatres as well as site-specific spaces; performers familiar to London audiences as well as artists and work that was wholly unfamiliar; live art, theatre, performance, explicit bodies, music, dance, and much more. It brought artists to London from all over the world, and it did the same for audiences. As such, it reflected the vision of the Pacitti Company and its Director, Robert Pacitti. But SPILL was also woven from the enthusiasm, interest and sometimes controversy sparked in the minds and conversations of the people who participated by performing, producing or watching the work. Just like Tarot, it offered up glimpses of human experience, with the desire to be read and absorbed into others’ lives.


SPILL: Overspill was an attempt to respond to the energy and achievement of SPILL through writing that respected the form and content of the festival and its processes, and that developed with the festival over time. Together, the seven writers involved (David Berridge, Rachel Lois Clapham, Mary Kate Connolly, Alex Eisenberg, Eleanor Hadley Kershaw, Mary Paterson and Theron Schmidt) created 55 pieces of writing. As well as responding to the work as we saw it during the festival, Overspill writers investigated the processes behind the finished product – interviewing artists, visiting rehearsals, and in most cases developing a collaborative process with the artist. We addressed questions to the audience and, within the confines of free blogging software, we tried to experiment with form. There were three days of writing workshops, two peer critiques, a complicated group editing system and ticket schedule, and one all night live writing performance. Like the SPILL Tarot, each individual blog post represents a complex web of professional practices and collaborations; what you’re reading here is the first card in the deck. We hope you will shuffle your own way through, and use this site to crystallise your thoughts in response to the SPILL Festival. Please make comments below, or email opendialogues@gmail.com


Mary Paterson is Co-Director of Open Dialogues. mary@opendialogues.com