Showing posts with label national platform. Show all posts
Showing posts with label national platform. Show all posts

National Platform - Day One - 18th April 2009

National Theatre Studio

18 April 2009


Over two days, the SPILL National Platform presented 20 performance works by emerging artists, selected from almost 300 applications. The works reflected an incredibly diverse range of forms and themes: durational and installation work, engagements with the conventions of theatre, interactive provocations, and autobiographical narrative.


As writers, we knew we would be unable to respond in detail to all of the work, but we also wanted to avoid imposing any selective criteria, even a random one, on which work was covered. We decided in advance of the Platform that we would impose a constraint on our responses. This would provide a structure for giving equal space to each of the performances and would make the most of our limited time. We decided that we would respond to each of the works, and we would limit our response to the space of a 3x5 index card.


We like the idea that each of the identical cards seems analogous to the opportunity offered to the emerging artists: a blank slot, to be filled individually, but unavoidably to be experienced side-by-side with the rest of the programme, as part of an assembly or collection of material.


Although for the most part we have prepared our cards after the event, there’s also something about this format that reflects the experience of writing: taking notes in the dark, collecting fragments and impressions and responses. Trying to capture not just the event on stage but our internal journeys. Thinking always, at every moment, even before the moment has finished, about how to translate into words the transient and complex experience.


These cards are only scraps, only partial and inadequate records of the events of the weekend, but we hope something of the extraordinary and boundless diversity of work is reflected by these responses. Perhaps they can stand as the beginning of a discussion – please add your own comments below.


Theron Schmidt



Please click on each image to view larger.

Please Note: You made need to zoom out/in using your browser to view the image in a suitable size.


Mamoru Iriguchi - Pregnant?!

by Alex Eisenberg




Madeleine Trigg - Sutre

by Mary Paterson



Elyssa Livergant - A Kiss From the Last Red Squirrel
by Mary Kate Connolly


Neil Trefor Hughes
Minimalist Music for Young People
by Alex Eisenberg
Alex continues his response to this work here.


Claire Adams -Photopollution
By Rachel Lois Clapham



Catalina Garces - Identi-ffy
By Rachel Lois Clapham


Mitch and Parry

I Host You, Now Tonight, Let Me Show You How

by Alex Eisenberg




Alex continues his response to Mitch and Parry here.

Amanda Couch - Dust Passing
by Mary Paterson



Other, Other, Other
Long Winded in Five Parts
by Eleanor Hadley Kershaw


Nathan Walker - Bad Bad
by Mary Kate Connolly

To read cards from day two click here.

The writers participating were Mary Kate Connolly, Rachel Lois Clapham, Alex Eisenberg, Eleanor Hadley Kershaw, Mary Paterson and Theron Schmidt.

National Platform - Day Two - 19 April 2009

National Theatre Studio

19 April 2009



Over two days, the SPILL National Platform presented 20 performance works by emerging artists, selected from almost 300 applications. The works reflected an incredibly diverse range of forms and themes: durational and installation work, engagements with the conventions of theatre, interactive provocations, and autobiographical narrative.


As writers, we knew we would be unable to respond in detail to all of the work, but we also wanted to avoid imposing any selective criteria, even a random one, on which work was covered. We decided in advance of the Platform that we would impose a constraint on our responses. This would provide a structure for giving equal space to each of the performances and would make the most of our limited time. We decided that we would respond to each of the works, and we would limit our response to the space of a 3x5 index card.


We like the idea that each of the identical cards seems analogous to the opportunity offered to the emerging artists: a blank slot, to be filled individually, but unavoidably to be experienced side-by-side with the rest of the programme, as part of an assembly or collection of material.


Although for the most part we have prepared our cards after the event, there’s also something about this format that reflects the experience of writing: taking notes in the dark, collecting fragments and impressions and responses. Trying to capture not just the event on stage but our internal journeys. Thinking always, at every moment, even before the moment has finished, about how to translate into words the transient and complex experience.


These cards are only scraps, only partial and inadequate records of the events of the weekend, but we hope something of the extraordinary and boundless diversity of work is reflected by these responses. Perhaps they can stand as the beginning of a discussion – please add your own comments below.


Theron Schmidt


Please click on each image to view larger.

Note: You made need to zoom out/in using your browser to view the image in a suitable size.


Victoria Pratt - Chasing Next Door's Cat

by Mary Paterson




Sohail Khan - Stress Positioning
by Rachel Lois Clapham



Simon Bowes - Kings of England
by Alex Eisenberg

Alex continues his response to this work here.



Silvia Rimat - Being Here While Not Being Here
by Theron Schmidt



Rasp Thorne - Blinded Descention
by Rachel Lois Clapham



Nicola Conibere - Count One
by Mary Paterson



Simone Kenyon and Neil Callaghan
To Begin Where I Am...Mokado
by Alex Eisenberg

Alex continues his response to this work here.


Sara Popowa - Stick Piece
by Eleanor Hadley Kershaw



Natasha Davis - Rupture
by Mary Paterson



Taylan Hallici - Introduction to floodlondon
by Mary Kate Connolly




To read cards from day one click here.


The writers participating were Mary Kate Connolly, Rachel Lois Clapham, Alex Eisenberg, Eleanor Hadley Kershaw, Mary Paterson and Theron Schmidt.

Alex's response to Mitch and Parry

Mitch and Parry (Andrew Mitchelson and Owen Parry)

I Host You, Now Tonight, Let Me Show You How


Part 1 - I Host You

This catches me off guard…it’s in the foyer, the place we have become accustomed to waiting for performances to begin. First glance – a projected video is playing on the wall - two mouths are close together - you can’t tell the gender immediately but then the structure of the face and its hair follicles confirms this as two men, two boys.


They are very close and excreting saliva in tandem, together, letting it delicately drip out of their mouths and inextricably combine. The process has been slowed down, the video form allowing the shifting of time as I zoom into, perhaps, the most everyday, visible and public of the bodily fluids – spit - which is raised to the level of subject in this three part work. Spit - usually wiped away, expelled, or sometimes the cause for embarrassment, is presented to us here as curiously beautiful and as it is subjected to gravity, it falls between the mouths, off the screen, making a small pool (of water) on the floor below the projection - a trace of this intimate moment now intruding into the foyer, where we wait for the next performance to begin.


Part 2 – Now Tonight


Mitch and Parry are wearing white underpants and hoodies. There is something of (half naked) teenage youths about these men, boyish and cute – but their hoods are up and they seem to mean business. The situation is some sort of ‘face off’, but also, always teetering on the edge of an embrace, always trying to get close, as they stand with about a meter between them, eyeing each other up.


The first projectile spit: head being jerked forward to maximise distance and achieve a suitable trajectory and it does seem to be a blow, it has gone straight to the face and, being the first spit, there is ample saliva. This could get messy but what continues is a ‘spitting match’ where the rules are simple – I spit at you (give), you spit at me (receive) – we aim to spit at each other – we mostly go for exposed areas of skin.


In Now Tonight, the act of spitting at someone is removed from its usual place of insult by this game-like situation. I recall the earlier video remembering that I have already become accustomed to Mitch and Parry’s notion of saliva as a substance that has more potential than might at first be apparent – as a substance that, in its own paradoxical way, builds human relations. I am, however, distracted from musing by the reality of events, by what I am witnessing.


I can’t help thinking about what it feels like to be spat at, and in the face. And so, I think about whether I have ever been spat at (…no) and then I think about other things that might have been projected onto my face by someone else (…yes), and how that feels. This spitting then, momentarily becomes eroticized: spit = cum = piss = shit.


Head being jerked forward to maximise distance and achieve a suitable trajectory and, yes, it does seem to be a blow, it has gone straight to the face. There is no talking; here, connection is only via the act of spitting as the saliva becomes some sort of visible and material utterance, showing and leaving traces of communication – attempts to reach out to each other.


I begin to feel a certain weight that comes with duration, repetition and exhaustion of the body and as the event continues relentlessly, I become conscious of how it must feel to expel and receive such unusually large quantities of saliva. This unsettles, but also allows me a further investment in the individuals playing the game. There is both a confusion of repulsion and intrigue as the smell of drying saliva occasionally wafts across the room.


The minimal soundscape of this work is made up of the spitting noises from the ‘giver’ and noises sometimes let out by the ‘receiver’ as the spit lands on his face. However I can’t quite tell whether these are sounds of pain or pleasure, and it is within the territory of doubt that this work places itself – so that you can’t quite tell if it’s a fight or foreplay, whether you win or loose, if they are gay or straight, whether it’s love or hate. And in this hazy territory - this in between - we constantly, though subtly, negotiate the performance, witnessing this act played out, until at the end, and eventually, a resolution comes with a hug, and they leave the stage.

Part Three – Performance - Let Me Show You How


The last part of Mitch and Parry’s performance, Let Me Show You How, continues to push the instability invoked through their use of saliva/spit/spitting. Parry, still dressed in his hoodie and underpants holds Mitch who is naked, vulnerable and boyish. Parry’s hold is loving, caring and tender and Mitch’s naked (almost dead) body is surrendered to this. The two look like a Pietà. Of course, the religious image is undone - by these men, by these boys, by the spectators and, of course, by this spit.


However, whereas before we had witnessed only the expulsion of saliva from the body, here the process has a further stage. In part three the act of spitting becomes allied to that of rubbing in. As Parry spits gently onto Mitch’s smooth skin and rubs in his saliva it is, of course, absorbed into the body. This is an intrusion in proportion to spit’s banal status. It is also another gesture of exchange, another inextricable act of combination. And with this exchange comes the more functional gesture – ‘cleaning up’. But this is a ‘cleaning up’ with spit, a paradoxical purification process.


A live video feed of the event is simultaneously shown on a large screen at the back of the stage, as a lone and passive cameraman moves around, zooming in and out, suggests to us other angles from which to view the landscape of these bodies. Sometimes I can’t relate the two images (live and video) as I see seemingly abstracted human forms on the screen and sometimes, brightly lit, the image invokes the language and voyeurism of pornography. This negotiation between the live and mediatised, challenges our act of watching; it suggests and demonstrates the possibility for re-framing, a theme to which all three parts of the work have insistently alluded. It is also in this state of in-between that I find some room for myself as a spectator. There are no seats in this performance, I can wander through at my own pace. And so, I begin slowly to pull into focus the previous events, to build my own narrative of the time and by doing so become implicated in the making of the work.


In all three works Owen Parry and Andrew Mitchelson make attempts at intimacy, and spitting always comes between them and between us, resisting any straightforward relationship to this work. This intimacy is, however, always devoid of any explicit or erotic actions and instead, we are presented with banality - re-made, re-placed and as it is, this work begins to share with us a new logic of human exchange.



Alex Eisenberg is an artist making performance. He is helping to coordinate SPILL: Overspill over the course of the festival.


Alex's response to the National Platform - Neil Callaghan and Simone Kenyon

Simone Kenyon and Neil Kenyon - To Begin Where I Am…

19 April 2009


Neil dials a number on his phone and amplifies it so we can all hear – it's Simone and it's great to hear from her, less because I know her (I don’t know her) but more because it is apparent that this phone call is live, happening now. She tells us she is about 30 seconds away and as the noise of the street begins to give way to more echoic tones, footsteps and then the sound of running – Simone bursts through the entrance to the studio at an electrifying pace. Attempting to foreground her new presence in the room, she jumps into Neil’s arms, displaying herself to us like a gymnast. Though, just as quickly – Neil disappears…and…it’s all a bit of a confusion – it felt like Neil should have stayed? But it's hard for them (perhaps for all of us) to be in the same place let alone the same time. And this performance becomes an attempt at demonstrating this difficulty in a variety of ways, from the delicate to the explosive.


A connection is played out along a blue cord which is threaded through Simone’s ear and which she uses to try to get Neil closer – he is back now and I feel pleased – I want them to be together, it feels more complete for all of us this way. The blue cord, which Simone breaks once Neil is close (how close is close?), is a way of creating and showing a relationship over distance, making distance intimate, a small victory perhaps?


As the two of them, wearing swimming costumes and life jackets, attempt to hold their breath and keep count of these durations, we witness another struggle and the impossibility of being in the same time. Neil can hold his breath longer than Simone.


A series of repeated actions, a dance reminiscent of Goat Island; these things seem somehow to lead us through to a moment where breathing is not distanced by time but instead through a two-sided harmonica, a more material thing, as they ask again, ‘what are the boundaries that come between us?’.


This work consciously places incongruous elements next to each other, so we can’t quite know, or we can’t quite say. Perhaps, we are left instead to find our own way through, to find out what is between ‘us’ (spectators) and ‘them’ (performers)?


Neil is leaving once again, but, like Simone before him, he is with us on the phone – telling us what is between him and us – and there’s a lot. He is in the city, Waterloo Station and it’s full of intrusions into and onto what was once a natural landscape. Perhaps therefore, their crude attempt at creating a storm (a natural force, a natural disaster even) with silver foil and a drum, is a reaction to the separation with which we are constantly faced, particularly now, when digital and virtual architectures give illusions of intimacy.


Faced with too large an expanse, Neil and Simone don’t give up – they keep trying, the storm is coming, they keep having a go and they do this stuff together no matter what it is and no matter what is in-between them.


Alex Eisenberg is an artist making performance. He is helping to coordinate SPILL: Overspill over the course of the festival.

Alex's response to the National Platform - Simon Bowes

Simon Bowes - Kings of England


This is a family affair and we are welcomed into the fold. Simon, his mum and his dad are dressed smartly for the occasion. This work attempts to explore time, gaps – the time between what dad was like then and what he is like now. There is, of course already a time gap apparent (it’s always present) and which is illustrated in Simon’s take on a suit and his father’s rather more immaculate or ‘stylish’ presentation, which evokes a past era.


Simon is clearly proud of his dad. He vocalises this in front of him and with us by way of various images from the past, projected using an overhead projector and operated by his father’s wife, he shares snapshots, a family album. And there’s this one that predominates – his father jumping off a cliff – black and white, suspended in mid-air, suspended in time. It is an image full of potential and in the context of this performance it asks: what might happen in a life?


Simon narrates this life from behind a stand and the lecture is broken up by short ‘scenes’ from the past, recreated for us in the present. The gap between then and now is emphasised by the impossibility of going back, of how you just can’t know then. At times this is light hearted, funny and celebratory, at others - particularly moments of trauma - I am brought into contact with thoughts about my own family, about life, love and death. There are moments where Simon chooses to imagine the past, placing his own view of the world back in time, confusing it, almost an attempt at changing what happened and there is an optimism in all of this.


This is a family that works together, although as a work it is undeniably presented to us as Simon’s view of things. There is a certain passivity of his father and more so of his mother. At one poignant moment she dances with her husband – and Simon proudly watches, drinking wine - but for this most part his mother appears to remain in the sidelines, in the shadows and I wonder how the particular politics of patriarchy and traditional family, to which this work points, might have been given more attention in this performance? Age, generation and tradition are central concerns of this work and were also brought into perspective in a wider sense, since it was the 9th performance in a day dominated by young artists’ work. There is, therefore, something hopeful about bringing older people, parents, into this forum, about the possibilities of age and about the future.




Alex Eisenberg is an artist making performance. He is helping to coordinate SPILL: Overspill over the course of the festival.

Alex's response to the National Platform - Neil Trefor Hughes

Neil Trefor Hughes – Minimalist Music for Young People


The mosquito – a small insect that makes you itch but also, the Mosquito - this other more technological thing, parasitic but in an entirely different and unnatural way - a device which omits a high frequency noise only audible to young people so as to deter them from loitering (or playing).


I ask to the person sitting next to me – ‘can you hear it?’


We don’t see Neil’s face in this performance, he is dressed head to toe in a dark grey (almost skin tight) costume which, in all its beautiful crudeness represents the mosquito. Obscured and out of sight, he talks to us as part terrorist, part entertainer, part mosquito, part Neil, invoking moments of celebration as he attempts to make good the mosquito. The humour of this work is complemented by Neil’s Welsh accent and his casual performance mode lays the foundations for a certain silliness and acceptance of the lo-fi aesthetic which runs throughout: disco lights that respond to noises, a foot operated smoke machine, a dodgy music stand and helium balloons which (just about) make his voice a bit more high pitched.


He is delivering a speech to us from behind a lectern and it’s a generous gesture, reclaiming this high pitch noise which we cannot hear and has echo’s of John Cage’s 4’33, but also reclaiming the status of being ‘a youth’ (in Wales) – not parasites, not pests, not invisible but instead, a look to the future?